SaaS Pricing Bullshit Bingo

Clients often have the freedom to walk away

Beyond Year One Commitments - Companies are increasingly securing multi-year agreements with their enterprise partners. While these deals showcase impressive ARR growth on paper, there's a twist – only the first year's revenue is genuinely "locked in". Post that, clients often have the freedom to walk away.

The model is double-edged

This model is double-edged. On one hand, it gifts clients unprecedented flexibility, potentially boosting initial buy-in. On the flip side, these contracts paint an uncertain future beyond the first year. Remember the last downturn where several CFOs aggressively renegotiated contract deals to optimize costs? It's a similar scenario here.

Real success for SaaS companies lies in user engagement

I believe real success for SaaS companies lies in user engagement – that’s the true marker of value. In light of this, should sales incentives pivot from contract value to actual usage? Gone are the days of sell-it-and-forget-it. The future is about developing lasting partnerships and aligning sales incentives with genuine customer success.

Thoughts?